State through Chandwad Police Station vs Sachin Anna Sonavane — 424/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHNS160009042025

Filing Number

723/2025

Filing Date

07-Jul-2025

Registration No

424/2025

Registration Date

07-Jul-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Chandwad

Judge

1-Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

144

Police Station

CHANDWAD POLICE STATION

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State through Chandwad Police Station

    Adv. Misar Ajay S. DGP.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sachin Anna Sonavane

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The court acquitted accused Sachin Anna Sonwane of charges under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act by invoking Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. The court found the case fit for closure due to prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence despite multiple summons/warrants, non-filing of the chemical analysis report, and prolonged delay causing abuse of legal process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  4. 30-Jan-2026

    PleaView PDF

  5. 30-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  6. 15-Sep-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  7. 07-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 07-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 424/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court acquitted accused Sachin Anna Sonwane of charges under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act by invoking Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. The court found the case fit for closure due to prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence despite multiple summons/warrants, non-filing of the chemical analysis report, and prolonged delay causing abuse of legal process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case