State Excise Flying Squad Satana Dist Nashik vs Rameshkumar sardarchand Talwal Advocate - Patil Vinayak S — 512/2020

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65. Disposed: Contested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Juvenile Cri.MA

CNR: MHNS160008382020

Filing Number

734/2020

Filing Date

14-Sep-2020

Registration No

512/2020

Registration Date

14-Sep-2020

Court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Chandwad

Judge

1-Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Excise Flying Squad Satana Dist Nashik

    Adv. Patil Jagdish S. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rameshkumar sardarchand Talwal Advocate - Patil Vinayak S

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The court acquitted accused Rameshkumar Sardarchand Talwal of charges under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act by invoking Section 258 CrPC, citing the prosecution's inability to secure the accused's presence despite multiple summons and warrants over an extended period. The court found that continuing the case would constitute an abuse of process and waste of judicial resources, warranting discontinuation of proceedings and the accused's discharge with cancellation of bail bonds and recall of non-bailable warrants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    N.B.W._Ready

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  5. 16-Jan-2026

    N.B.W._Ready

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  6. 20-Aug-2025

    N.B.W._Ready

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  7. 02-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  8. 11-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  9. 20-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  10. 16-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  11. 19-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  12. 26-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  13. 29-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  14. 22-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  15. 24-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  16. 24-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  17. 06-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  18. 17-Jun-2022

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  19. 20-May-2022

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  20. 29-Apr-2022

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  21. 25-Mar-2022

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  22. 28-Jan-2022

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  23. 03-Dec-2021

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  24. 01-Oct-2021

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  25. 13-Aug-2021

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  26. 14-Jun-2021

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  27. 16-Apr-2021

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  28. 05-Feb-2021

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  29. 14-Jan-2021

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  30. 14-Sep-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 14-Sep-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 512/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court acquitted accused Rameshkumar Sardarchand Talwal of charges under Section 65(e) of the Bombay Prohibition Act by invoking Section 258 CrPC, citing the prosecution's inability to secure the accused's presence despite multiple summons and warrants over an extended period. The court found that continuing the case would constitute an abuse of process and waste of judicial resources, warranting discontinuation of proceedings and the accused's discharge with cancellation of bail bonds and recall of non-bailable warrants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case