State Excise Kalwan Division Dist Nashik vs Sameer Vikram Jadhav — 397/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHNS160008222025

Filing Number

666/2025

Filing Date

19-Jun-2025

Registration No

397/2025

Registration Date

19-Jun-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Chandwad

Judge

1-Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Excise Kalwan Division Dist Nashik

    Adv. Misar Ajay S. DGP.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sameer Vikram Jadhav

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court acquitted accused Samir Vikram Jadhav in a Bombay Prohibition Act case (Section 65(e)) by invoking Section 258 of the CrPC, citing the prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence, produce the chemical analysis report, and prolonged case delays. The court found this a fit case to stop proceedings to prevent abuse of process and waste of public resources, canceling all bail bonds and notices issued against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  4. 30-Jan-2026

    PleaView PDF

  5. 30-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  6. 19-Sep-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  7. 19-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 19-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 397/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted accused Samir Vikram Jadhav in a Bombay Prohibition Act case (Section 65(e)) by invoking Section 258 of the CrPC, citing the prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence, produce the chemical analysis report, and prolonged case delays. The court found this a fit case to stop proceedings to prevent abuse of process and waste of public resources, canceling all bail bonds and notices issued against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case