State through Chandwad Police Station vs Rajaram Trambak Thonbare — 372/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(e). Disposed: Contested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS160007642025
Filing Number
621/2025
Filing Date
10-Jun-2025
Registration No
372/2025
Registration Date
10-Jun-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Chandwad
Judge
1-Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
408
Police Station
CHANDWAD POLICE STATION
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State through Chandwad Police Station
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rajaram Trambak Thonbare
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate First Class court acquitted accused Rajaram Trambak Thombare in a Bombay Prohibition Act case by invoking Section 258 CrPC, citing abuse of process. The prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence despite multiple summons/warrants and failed to file the chemical analysis report, causing the case to linger without progress. All bail bonds were cancelled, NBWs recalled, and the case disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
30-Jan-2026
PleaView PDF
-
30-Jan-2026
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
10-Sep-2025
Awaiting Summons
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
10-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 372/2025
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate First Class court acquitted accused Rajaram Trambak Thombare in a Bombay Prohibition Act case by invoking Section 258 CrPC, citing abuse of process. The prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence despite multiple summons/warrants and failed to file the chemical analysis report, causing the case to linger without progress. All bail bonds were cancelled, NBWs recalled, and the case disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts