Prabhakar Damodhar Pagare other 4 vs Dilip Mohan Tribhuvan other 11 Advocate - Wagh Dhananjay S — 101/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section cpc. Status: Steps_Unready. Next hearing: 30th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHNS160006602022
Next Hearing
30th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
140/2022
Filing Date
21-06-2022
Registration No
101/2022
Registration Date
21-06-2022
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Chandwad
Judge
1-CJJD and JMFC, Chandwad
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Prabhakar Damodhar Pagare other 4
Adv. Thakare Ganesh V.
Shankar Damodhar Pagare
Dinkar Damodhar Pagare
Ratnakar Damodhar Pagare
Hirabai Yashwant Ubale
Respondent(s)
Dilip Mohan Tribhuvan other 11 Advocate - Wagh Dhananjay S
Shekhar Dilip Tribhuvan
Swapnil Dilip Tribhuvan
Madhukar Waman Ahire
Nishikant Waman Ahire
Savita Waman Shiral
Indumati Hemant Jadhav
Anand Vinod Lalwani
Kantilal Kapurchand Chordiya
Mahavir Vinod Lalwani
Mukesh Vinod Lalwani
Rakesh Vinod Lalwani
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC, Chandwad
Steps_Unready
Ex-Parte Order
Written Statement
Written Statement
Written Statement
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Steps_Unready | |
| 10-03-2026 | Ex-Parte Order | |
| 25-02-2026 | Written Statement | |
| 22-01-2026 | Written Statement | |
| 11-12-2025 | Written Statement |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Civil Judge allowed defendants 1-3's application to set aside the "No Written Statement" (W.S.) order against them, permitting them to file their written statement despite the significant delay (nearly 3 years from service of summons). The court prioritized fair adjudication and the defendants' right to be heard, imposing Rs. 25,000 cost payable to plaintiffs as compensation for the delay, with failure to pay resulting in case proceeding further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Civil Judge allowed defendants 1-3's application to set aside the "No Written Statement" (W.S.) order against them, permitting them to file their written statement despite the significant delay (nearly 3 years from service of summons). The court prioritized fair adjudication and the defendants' right to be heard, imposing Rs. 25,000 cost payable to plaintiffs as compensation for the delay, with failure to pay resulting in case proceeding further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts