State through Chandwad Police Station vs Gill Darshansingh Charansingh Advocate - Thakare Ganesh V. — 224/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Contested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS160005152024
Filing Number
431/2024
Filing Date
01-Apr-2024
Registration No
224/2024
Registration Date
01-Apr-2024
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Chandwad
Judge
1-Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
454
Police Station
CHANDWAD POLICE STATION
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State through Chandwad Police Station
Adv. Patil Jagdish S. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Gill Darshansingh Charansingh Advocate - Thakare Ganesh V.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The court acquitted accused Gil Darshansing Charansing in a Bombay Prohibition Act case under Section 258 CrPC due to prosecution's failure to secure his presence despite multiple summons/warrants, non-filing of chemical analysis report, and case stagnation. The court found continuing proceedings would constitute abuse of process and waste of public resources, therefore ordering case closure, cancellation of bail bonds, and withdrawal of notices. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
30-Jan-2026
N.B.W._Unready
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
28-Aug-2025
Plea / Particulars
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
23-Apr-2025
Unready Board
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
27-Jan-2025
Unready Board
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
04-Oct-2024
Unready Board
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
06-Jul-2024
Unready Board
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
01-Apr-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Apr-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 224/2024
Summary: The court acquitted accused Gil Darshansing Charansing in a Bombay Prohibition Act case under Section 258 CrPC due to prosecution's failure to secure his presence despite multiple summons/warrants, non-filing of chemical analysis report, and case stagnation. The court found continuing proceedings would constitute abuse of process and waste of public resources, therefore ordering case closure, cancellation of bail bonds, and withdrawal of notices. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts