State Excise Flying Squad Satana Dist Nashik vs Kautik Thakre Advocate - Wagh Dhananjay S — 246/2020
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Contested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS160003692020
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
335/2020
Filing Date
05-03-2020
Registration No
246/2020
Registration Date
05-03-2020
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Chandwad
Judge
1-CJJD and JMFC, Chandwad
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Excise Flying Squad Satana Dist Nashik
Adv. Mirza Aijaz J. APP
Respondent(s)
Kautik Thakre Advocate - Wagh Dhananjay S
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC, Chandwad
Disposed
N.B.W._Ready
N.B.W._Ready
N.B.W._Ready
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 27-02-2026 | N.B.W._Ready | |
| 16-01-2026 | N.B.W._Ready | |
| 20-08-2025 | N.B.W._Ready | |
| 02-07-2025 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted accused Kautik Madhav Thakare in a Bombay Prohibition Act case by invoking Section 258 CrPC, finding that despite multiple summons and warrants, the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence and the matter had stalled indefinitely. The court determined that continuing the proceedings would constitute an abuse of process and waste of public resources, warranting closure of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted accused Kautik Madhav Thakare in a Bombay Prohibition Act case by invoking Section 258 CrPC, finding that despite multiple summons and warrants, the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence and the matter had stalled indefinitely. The court determined that continuing the proceedings would constitute an abuse of process and waste of public resources, warranting closure of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts