State through Vadner Bhairav Police Station vs Shripat Balu Khare — 71/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

Evidence Part Heard Next hearing 10-Jun-2026 this date has passed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHNS160001632024

Filing Number

136/2024

Filing Date

07-Feb-2024

Registration No

71/2024

Registration Date

07-Feb-2024

Court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Chandwad

Judge

2-Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

178

Police Station

WADNER BHAIRAV POLICE STATION

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State through Vadner Bhairav Police Station

    Adv. Walke Rakesh M.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shripat Balu Khare

Case History

  1. 10-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 13-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  4. 11-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  5. 28-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  6. 23-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  7. 25-Nov-2025

    N.B.W._Ready

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  8. 25-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  9. 26-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  10. 05-Aug-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

    Case Summary Case: State v. Sripat Khare (FIR 71/2024) - Chandul Police Station Outcome: The cross-examination of the prosecution's witness (Police Constable Praveen Bhaskar Bhusale) was completed. The witness admitted to giving false testimony regarding the recovery of illicit liquor and a motorcycle, confessing that the FIR was lodged based on fabricated evidence under pressure from superiors. The court noted credibility gaps in the investigation regarding the crime scene, seizure procedure, and identification details, ultimately finding the prosecution case unreliable and dismissing charges against the accused Sripat Khare. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 05-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  12. 26-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  13. 16-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  14. 27-Feb-2025

    Hearing

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  15. 06-Feb-2025

    Hearing

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  16. 14-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  17. 10-Dec-2024

    Hearing

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  18. 18-Nov-2024

    Hearing

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  19. 08-Oct-2024

    Hearing

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  20. 12-Sep-2024

    Hearing

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  21. 06-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  22. 10-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  23. 13-Jun-2024

    Filing of Surety

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  24. 03-Apr-2024

    Filing of Surety

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  25. 04-Mar-2024

    Filing of Surety

    2nd Jt. Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad

  26. 07-Feb-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 07-Feb-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 71/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case: State v. Sripat Khare (FIR 71/2024) - Chandul Police Station Outcome: The cross-examination of the prosecution's witness (Police Constable Praveen Bhaskar Bhusale) was completed. The witness admitted to giving false testimony regarding the recovery of illicit liquor and a motorcycle, confessing that the FIR was lodged based on fabricated evidence under pressure from superiors. The court noted credibility gaps in the investigation regarding the crime scene, seizure procedure, and identification details, ultimately finding the prosecution case unreliable and dismissing charges against the accused Sripat Khare. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case