State through Vadner Bhairav Police Station vs Shripat Balu Khare — 71/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHNS160001632024

Evidence Part Heard

Next Hearing

10th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

136/2024

Filing Date

07-02-2024

Registration No

71/2024

Registration Date

07-02-2024

Court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Chandwad

Judge

2-Jt. CJJD and JMFC, Chandwad

FIR Details

FIR Number

178

Police Station

WADNER BHAIRAV POLICE STATION

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65E

Petitioner(s)

State through Vadner Bhairav Police Station

Adv. Walke Rakesh M.

Respondent(s)

Shripat Balu Khare

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Jt. CJJD and JMFC, Chandwad

13-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

10-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

11-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

28-01-2026

Evidence Part Heard

23-12-2025

Evidence Part Heard

Interim Orders

05-08-2025
Evidence

Case Summary Case: State v. Sripat Khare (FIR 71/2024) - Chandul Police Station Outcome: The cross-examination of the prosecution's witness (Police Constable Praveen Bhaskar Bhusale) was completed. The witness admitted to giving false testimony regarding the recovery of illicit liquor and a motorcycle, confessing that the FIR was lodged based on fabricated evidence under pressure from superiors. The court noted credibility gaps in the investigation regarding the crime scene, seizure procedure, and identification details, ultimately finding the prosecution case unreliable and dismissing charges against the accused Sripat Khare. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case: State v. Sripat Khare (FIR 71/2024) - Chandul Police Station Outcome: The cross-examination of the prosecution's witness (Police Constable Praveen Bhaskar Bhusale) was completed. The witness admitted to giving false testimony regarding the recovery of illicit liquor and a motorcycle, confessing that the FIR was lodged based on fabricated evidence under pressure from superiors. The court noted credibility gaps in the investigation regarding the crime scene, seizure procedure, and identification details, ultimately finding the prosecution case unreliable and dismissing charges against the accused Sripat Khare. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Chandwad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case