State through Vadner Bhairav Police Station vs Shripat Balu Khare — 71/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS160001632024
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
136/2024
Filing Date
07-02-2024
Registration No
71/2024
Registration Date
07-02-2024
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Chandwad
Judge
2-Jt. CJJD and JMFC, Chandwad
FIR Details
FIR Number
178
Police Station
WADNER BHAIRAV POLICE STATION
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State through Vadner Bhairav Police Station
Adv. Walke Rakesh M.
Respondent(s)
Shripat Balu Khare
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. CJJD and JMFC, Chandwad
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 11-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 28-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 23-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case: State v. Sripat Khare (FIR 71/2024) - Chandul Police Station Outcome: The cross-examination of the prosecution's witness (Police Constable Praveen Bhaskar Bhusale) was completed. The witness admitted to giving false testimony regarding the recovery of illicit liquor and a motorcycle, confessing that the FIR was lodged based on fabricated evidence under pressure from superiors. The court noted credibility gaps in the investigation regarding the crime scene, seizure procedure, and identification details, ultimately finding the prosecution case unreliable and dismissing charges against the accused Sripat Khare. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: State v. Sripat Khare (FIR 71/2024) - Chandul Police Station Outcome: The cross-examination of the prosecution's witness (Police Constable Praveen Bhaskar Bhusale) was completed. The witness admitted to giving false testimony regarding the recovery of illicit liquor and a motorcycle, confessing that the FIR was lodged based on fabricated evidence under pressure from superiors. The court noted credibility gaps in the investigation regarding the crime scene, seizure procedure, and identification details, ultimately finding the prosecution case unreliable and dismissing charges against the accused Sripat Khare. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts