State through Vadner Bhairav Police Station vs Rakesh Ananda Purkar — 50/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 223,. Status: Plea / Particulars. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS160001182025
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
81/2025
Filing Date
21-01-2025
Registration No
50/2025
Registration Date
21-01-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Chandwad
Judge
2-Jt. CJJD and JMFC, Chandwad
FIR Details
FIR Number
354
Police Station
WADNER BHAIRAV POLICE STATION
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State through Vadner Bhairav Police Station
Adv. Walke Rakesh M.
Respondent(s)
Rakesh Ananda Purkar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. CJJD and JMFC, Chandwad
Plea / Particulars
Plea / Particulars
Plea / Particulars
Plea / Particulars
Plea / Particulars
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-04-2026 | Plea / Particulars | |
| 10-03-2026 | Plea / Particulars | |
| 03-02-2026 | Plea / Particulars | |
| 03-12-2025 | Plea / Particulars | |
| 29-10-2025 | Plea / Particulars |
Interim Orders
Summary: The petition for interim custody of a seized Vivo mobile phone and Airtel SIM card in FIR No. 354/2024 (Maharashtra Gambling Prohibition Act, 1887) was granted. The petitioner, Rakesh Anand Purkar, was released the mobile phone on a bond of ₹30,000 with conditions including proper custody, submission of photographs to the investigating officer, and production before the court as required. The investigating officer was directed to take colored photographs of the seized mobile before its release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The petition for interim custody of a seized Vivo mobile phone and Airtel SIM card in FIR No. 354/2024 (Maharashtra Gambling Prohibition Act, 1887) was granted. The petitioner, Rakesh Anand Purkar, was released the mobile phone on a bond of ₹30,000 with conditions including proper custody, submission of photographs to the investigating officer, and production before the court as required. The investigating officer was directed to take colored photographs of the seized mobile before its release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts