Vilas Dhondiram Deshmane vs Manik Khanderao Nikhade Advocate - Pawar Popatrao D. — 15/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39A. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHNS160000852026

Evidence

Next Hearing

02nd May 2026

e-Filing Number

22-01-2026

Filing Number

26/2026

Filing Date

22-01-2026

Registration No

15/2026

Registration Date

22-01-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Chandwad

Judge

1-CJJD and JMFC, Chandwad

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 39A
Specific Relief Act Section Section38and39
IA/1/2026 Classification : Amendment of the pleadings Section Vilas Dhondiram DeshmaneManik Khanderao Nikhade
IA/2/2026 Classification : Temporary - Interim Injunction Section Vilas Dhondiram DeshmaneManik Khanderao Nikhade

Petitioner(s)

Vilas Dhondiram Deshmane

Adv. DESHMANE JAYASHREE VILAS

Respondent(s)

Manik Khanderao Nikhade Advocate - Pawar Popatrao D.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC, Chandwad

06-04-2026

Evidence

04-04-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

30-03-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

20-03-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

20-03-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

Interim Orders

10-03-2026
Order on T.I.
10-03-2026
Issues
06-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for police protection to level his field over disputed property (Gat No. 219/1). Although an interim injunction had previously been granted restraining the defendant from interfering with the plaintiff's possession, the court held that police protection is an extreme remedy reserved only for threats of injunction violations, not for enforcing actual possession or agricultural activities. The court directed the plaintiff to pursue contempt proceedings under Order XXXIX Rule 2A or execution petitions under Order XXI Rule 32 of the CPC instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for police protection to level his field over disputed property (Gat No. 219/1). Although an interim injunction had previously been granted restraining the defendant from interfering with the plaintiff's possession, the court held that police protection is an extreme remedy reserved only for threats of injunction violations, not for enforcing actual possession or agricultural activities. The court directed the plaintiff to pursue contempt proceedings under Order XXXIX Rule 2A or execution petitions under Order XXI Rule 32 of the CPC instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Chandwad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case