Vilas Dhondiram Deshmane vs Manik Khanderao Nikhade Advocate - Pawar Popatrao D. — 15/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39A. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHNS160000852026
e-Filing Number
22-01-2026
Filing Number
26/2026
Filing Date
22-Jan-2026
Registration No
15/2026
Registration Date
22-Jan-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Chandwad
Judge
1-Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Vilas Dhondiram Deshmane
Adv. DESHMANE JAYASHREE VILAS
Respondent(s)
-
1.Manik Khanderao Nikhade Advocate - Pawar Popatrao D.
Case History
-
02-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Apr-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
06-Apr-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
06-Apr-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
06-Apr-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for police protection to level his field over disputed property (Gat No. 219/1). Although an interim injunction had previously been granted restraining the defendant from interfering with the plaintiff's possession, the court held that police protection is an extreme remedy reserved only for threats of injunction violations, not for enforcing actual possession or agricultural activities. The court directed the plaintiff to pursue contempt proceedings under Order XXXIX Rule 2A or execution petitions under Order XXI Rule 32 of the CPC instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Apr-2026
Evidence
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
04-Apr-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
30-Mar-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
20-Mar-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
20-Mar-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
18-Mar-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
16-Mar-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
10-Mar-2026
Order on T.I.View PDF
-
10-Mar-2026
IssuesView PDF
-
10-Mar-2026
List of Witness
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
04-Mar-2026
Order
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
25-Feb-2026
Order
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
21-Feb-2026
Order
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
18-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
07-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
29-Jan-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
24-Jan-2026
W.S. and Say
Cjjd and JMFC, Chandwad
-
22-Jan-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
22-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 15/2026
Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's application for police protection to level his field over disputed property (Gat No. 219/1). Although an interim injunction had previously been granted restraining the defendant from interfering with the plaintiff's possession, the court held that police protection is an extreme remedy reserved only for threats of injunction violations, not for enforcing actual possession or agricultural activities. The court directed the plaintiff to pursue contempt proceedings under Order XXXIX Rule 2A or execution petitions under Order XXI Rule 32 of the CPC instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts