State through Chandwad Police Station vs Shankar Parashram Gangurde other 1 Advocate - Vyavahare Vishal A — 4/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 325,323,504,506,34. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS160000092024
Next Hearing
05th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
9/2024
Filing Date
01-01-2024
Registration No
4/2024
Registration Date
01-01-2024
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Chandwad
Judge
1-CJJD and JMFC, Chandwad
FIR Details
FIR Number
431
Police Station
CHANDWAD POLICE STATION
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State through Chandwad Police Station
Adv. Patil Jagdish S. APP
Respondent(s)
Shankar Parashram Gangurde other 1 Advocate - Vyavahare Vishal A
Meerabai Parashram Gangurde
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC, Chandwad
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 03-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 16-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 17-11-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: The case (RCC No. 04/2024, State vs. Shankar +1) involved testimony regarding alleged assault on a pregnant woman. The court found the prosecution witness's testimony contained significant contradictions during cross-examination, with the defense establishing that the alleged incident may have resulted from an accident rather than deliberate assault. The court concluded the case should be dismissed as the evidence presented was insufficient and contradictory, ultimately ruling in favor of the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The case (RCC No. 04/2024, State vs. Shankar +1) involved testimony regarding alleged assault on a pregnant woman. The court found the prosecution witness's testimony contained significant contradictions during cross-examination, with the defense establishing that the alleged incident may have resulted from an accident rather than deliberate assault. The court concluded the case should be dismissed as the evidence presented was insufficient and contradictory, ultimately ruling in favor of the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts