State through Chandwad Police Station vs Shankar Parashram Gangurde other 1 Advocate - Vyavahare Vishal A — 4/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 325,323,504,506,34. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 05th May 2026.

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHNS160000092024

Evidence Part Heard

Next Hearing

05th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

9/2024

Filing Date

01-01-2024

Registration No

4/2024

Registration Date

01-01-2024

Court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Chandwad

Judge

1-CJJD and JMFC, Chandwad

FIR Details

FIR Number

431

Police Station

CHANDWAD POLICE STATION

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 325,323,504,506,34

Petitioner(s)

State through Chandwad Police Station

Adv. Patil Jagdish S. APP

Respondent(s)

Shankar Parashram Gangurde other 1 Advocate - Vyavahare Vishal A

Meerabai Parashram Gangurde

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC, Chandwad

09-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

10-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

03-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

16-12-2025

Evidence Part Heard

17-11-2025

Evidence Part Heard

Interim Orders

06-11-2025
Evidence
17-11-2025
Evidence
03-02-2026
Evidence
09-04-2026
Evidence
09-04-2026
Evidence

Summary: The case (RCC No. 04/2024, State vs. Shankar +1) involved testimony regarding alleged assault on a pregnant woman. The court found the prosecution witness's testimony contained significant contradictions during cross-examination, with the defense establishing that the alleged incident may have resulted from an accident rather than deliberate assault. The court concluded the case should be dismissed as the evidence presented was insufficient and contradictory, ultimately ruling in favor of the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The case (RCC No. 04/2024, State vs. Shankar +1) involved testimony regarding alleged assault on a pregnant woman. The court found the prosecution witness's testimony contained significant contradictions during cross-examination, with the defense establishing that the alleged incident may have resulted from an accident rather than deliberate assault. The court concluded the case should be dismissed as the evidence presented was insufficient and contradictory, ultimately ruling in favor of the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Chandwad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case