State Excise vs Sachin Limbaji Sahajrav — 884/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65e. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS140018222024
Filing Number
1398/2024
Filing Date
19-Dec-2024
Registration No
884/2024
Registration Date
19-Dec-2024
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Dindori
Judge
2-CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
273
Police Station
STATE EXCISE DEPARTMENT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Excise
Adv. Kadam Ratna A.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sachin Limbaji Sahajrav
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code and acquitted accused Sachin Limbaji Sahajrav of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, citing prolonged pendency, prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence, and missing investigation reports. The accused's bail bond was canceled and seized liquor was ordered to be transferred to the State Excise Department. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
-
03-Feb-2026
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
-
12-Dec-2025
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
-
03-Oct-2025
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
-
21-May-2025
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
-
21-Dec-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Dec-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 884/2024
The court stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code and acquitted accused Sachin Limbaji Sahajrav of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, citing prolonged pendency, prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence, and missing investigation reports. The accused's bail bond was canceled and seized liquor was ordered to be transferred to the State Excise Department. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts