State Through Vani Police Station vs Navasu Ramchandra Malekar — 873/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS140018062024
e-Filing Number
11-12-2024
Filing Number
1384/2024
Filing Date
17-Dec-2024
Registration No
873/2024
Registration Date
17-Dec-2024
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Dindori
Judge
2-CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
367
Police Station
VANI POLICE STATION
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Through Vani Police Station
Adv. Kadam Ratna A.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Navasu Ramchandra Malekar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court ordered the discontinuation of proceedings against Navasu Ramchandra Malekar under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code, citing the prosecution's failure to produce witnesses and the absence of the Complaint Analysis (CA) report in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case pending for an extended period. The accused was acquitted of charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, his bail bond was canceled, and the seized liquor was directed to be transferred to the State Excise Department after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
-
13-Feb-2026
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
-
19-Dec-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
-
19-Sep-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
-
19-Apr-2025
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
-
19-Dec-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Dec-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 873/2024
The court ordered the discontinuation of proceedings against Navasu Ramchandra Malekar under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code, citing the prosecution's failure to produce witnesses and the absence of the Complaint Analysis (CA) report in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case pending for an extended period. The accused was acquitted of charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, his bail bond was canceled, and the seized liquor was directed to be transferred to the State Excise Department after the appeal period expires. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts