Hiraman Dagu Battase vs None — 65/2025

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHNS140017972025

e-Filing Number

22-11-2025

Filing Number

438/2025

Filing Date

27-Nov-2025

Registration No

65/2025

Registration Date

27-Nov-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Dindori

Judge

2-CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Hiraman Dagu Battase

    Adv. Vadje Nilesh K.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.None

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court granted the petitioner Diramun Gu Battase's application for a Heirship Certificate under the Bombay Regulation Act 1827, recognizing him as the sole legal heir of the deceased Bhagirathi Bai Gu Battase (who died on 14/07/2000). The court found that the petitioner had established his claim through documentary and oral evidence, and directed the appropriate authority to issue the Heirship Certificate as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Order

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Order

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori

  7. 07-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Notice

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori

  8. 28-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 27-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 65/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted the petitioner Diramun Gu Battase's application for a Heirship Certificate under the Bombay Regulation Act 1827, recognizing him as the sole legal heir of the deceased Bhagirathi Bai Gu Battase (who died on 14/07/2000). The court found that the petitioner had established his claim through documentary and oral evidence, and directed the appropriate authority to issue the Heirship Certificate as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case