Jagan Sakharam Bhavar vs Bajirao Trimbak Nimase Advocate - chavan Shailesh B. — 322/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Reply/Say. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHNS140017412025
e-Filing Number
17-11-2025
Filing Number
431/2025
Filing Date
17-Nov-2025
Registration No
322/2025
Registration Date
17-Nov-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Dindori
Judge
3-Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Jagan Sakharam Bhavar
Adv. Vadje Nilesh K.
-
2.Sahebrao Sakharam Bhavar
Adv. Vadje Nilesh K.
-
3.Dilip Sakharam Bhavar
Adv. Vadje Nilesh K.
-
4.Vijay Sakharam Bhavar
Adv. Vadje Nilesh K.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Bajirao Trimbak Nimase Advocate - chavan Shailesh B.
-
2.Ashok Trambak Shete
-
3.Uttam Ganpat Bhavar
-
4.Kamal Arun Bhavar
-
5.Jayram Tukaram Fugat
-
6.Jyoti Sudam Bhavar
-
7.Tarabai Shantaram Dharble
-
8.Dattatray Kondaji Bhavar
-
9.Deepak Sudam Bhavar
-
10.Daulat Kashinath Bhavar
-
11.Pundlik Bhika Bhavar
-
12.Bajirao Karbhari Bhavar
-
13.Balu Karbhari Bhavar
-
14.Bhanudas Sukdev Bhavar
-
15.Ramnath Eknath Bhavar
-
16.Rahul Revaji Nimase
-
17.Roshanlal Teluram Agrawal
Adv. chavan Shailesh B.
-
18.Varsha Sudam Bhavar
-
19.Vinayak Kashinath Bhavar
-
20.Sachin Arun Bhavar
-
21.Sanjay Tukaram Bhavar
-
22.Sampat Eknath Bhavar
-
23.Sushila Sudam Bhavar
-
24.Manisha Girish Shah
-
25.Riyan Manish Shah
Case History
-
16-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Apr-2026
Reply/Say
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
-
08-Apr-2026
Reply/Say
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
-
10-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
-
23-Feb-2026
Reply/Say
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
-
05-Jan-2026
Reply/Say
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
-
10-Dec-2025
Reply/Say
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
-
19-Nov-2025
Unready Board
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
-
18-Nov-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The court granted an interim ex-parte injunction against Defendant No. 1, restraining him from conducting any partition (subdivision) of the disputed agricultural property pending resolution of the dispute over inheritance and land ownership rights. The court found sufficient grounds for the injunction given the conflicting claims regarding land area (80 acres vs. 31 acres) and ordered the defendant to file his response by 10/12/2025 to show cause why the injunction should not be made permanent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Nov-2025
Unready Board
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
-
17-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 322/2025
Summary: The court granted an interim ex-parte injunction against Defendant No. 1, restraining him from conducting any partition (subdivision) of the disputed agricultural property pending resolution of the dispute over inheritance and land ownership rights. The court found sufficient grounds for the injunction given the conflicting claims regarding land area (80 acres vs. 31 acres) and ordered the defendant to file his response by 10/12/2025 to show cause why the injunction should not be made permanent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts