State Through Vani Police Station vs Balu Tukaram Pandagle — 800/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHNS140016192024

e-Filing Number

04-11-2024

Filing Number

1263/2024

Filing Date

06-Nov-2024

Registration No

800/2024

Registration Date

06-Nov-2024

Court

Civil and Criminal Court ,Dindori

Judge

2-CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

229

Police Station

VANI POLICE STATION

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Through Vani Police Station

    Adv. Kadam Ratna A.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Balu Tukaram Pandagle

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court stopped proceedings against Balu Tukaram Pandagle under Section 258 CrPC and acquitted him of charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, citing the prosecution's failure to secure witness presence and prolonged case pendency. The seized liquor will be sent to the State Excise Department after the appeal period, and the accused's bail bond stands canceled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori

  4. 13-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori

  5. 16-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori

  6. 16-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori

  7. 16-Apr-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori

  8. 07-Mar-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori

  9. 07-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 06-Nov-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 800/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The court stopped proceedings against Balu Tukaram Pandagle under Section 258 CrPC and acquitted him of charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, citing the prosecution's failure to secure witness presence and prolonged case pendency. The seized liquor will be sent to the State Excise Department after the appeal period, and the accused's bail bond stands canceled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case