State Through Vani Police Station vs Pundlik Raghunath Dambale — 799/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS140016182024
e-Filing Number
04-11-2024
Filing Number
1262/2024
Filing Date
06-Nov-2024
Registration No
799/2024
Registration Date
06-Nov-2024
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Dindori
Judge
2-CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
260
Police Station
VANI POLICE STATION
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Through Vani Police Station
Adv. Kadam Ratna A.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Pundlik Raghunath Dambale
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dindori, stopped proceedings against Pundlik Raghunath Dambale under Section 258 CrPC and acquitted him of charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, citing the prosecution's failure to secure witness presence and absence of the CA report despite the case being pending for an extended period. The accused's bail bond was canceled and the seized liquor was ordered to be forwarded to the State Excise Department after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
-
13-Feb-2026
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
-
16-Dec-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
-
16-Sep-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
-
16-Apr-2025
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
-
07-Mar-2025
Awaiting Summons
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
-
07-Nov-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Nov-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 799/2024
The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dindori, stopped proceedings against Pundlik Raghunath Dambale under Section 258 CrPC and acquitted him of charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, citing the prosecution's failure to secure witness presence and absence of the CA report despite the case being pending for an extended period. The accused's bail bond was canceled and the seized liquor was ordered to be forwarded to the State Excise Department after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts