Nathu Vithoba Gaikwad vs Pandharinath Daulat Gaikwad etc 4 Advocate - Deshpande Neeraj J. — 96/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39. Status: Steps_Unready. Next hearing: 06th May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHNS140009402019
Next Hearing
06th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
126/2019
Filing Date
23-07-2019
Registration No
96/2019
Registration Date
23-07-2019
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Dindori
Judge
2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC DINDORI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nathu Vithoba Gaikwad
Adv. Ghorpade Pradip S.
Respondent(s)
Pandharinath Daulat Gaikwad etc 4 Advocate - Deshpande Neeraj J.
Rajendra Daulat Gaikwad
Adv. Deshpande Neeraj J.
Gulab Daulat Gaikwad
Adv. Deshpande Neeraj J.
Shantaram Daulat Gaikwad
Adv. Deshpande Neeraj J.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC DINDORI
Steps_Unready
For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready
Steps_Unready
Steps_Unready
Steps_Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Steps_Unready | |
| 13-01-2026 | For Referal to the Special Mediation Drive Mediation For the Nation _Unready | |
| 18-12-2025 | Steps_Unready | |
| 12-11-2025 | Steps_Unready | |
| 18-08-2025 | Steps_Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The defendant's application to set aside the no-written-statement order dated 24/02/2021 was allowed. The court accepted the defendant's contention that COVID-19 lockdown caused the delay in filing the written statement and found it just to give him a fair opportunity to present his case in this perpetual injunction suit. The defendant must pay Rs. 200 as cost to the plaintiff before his written statement is read and recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The defendant's application to set aside the no-written-statement order dated 24/02/2021 was allowed. The court accepted the defendant's contention that COVID-19 lockdown caused the delay in filing the written statement and found it just to give him a fair opportunity to present his case in this perpetual injunction suit. The defendant must pay Rs. 200 as cost to the plaintiff before his written statement is read and recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts