Ramrao Kashinath Uphade vs Chhaya Dattatray Shelke Advocate - chavan Shailesh B. — 119/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 39rule1. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHNS140008042023
e-Filing Number
20-06-2023
Filing Number
153/2023
Filing Date
22-Jun-2023
Registration No
119/2023
Registration Date
22-Jun-2023
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Dindori
Judge
3-Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ramrao Kashinath Uphade
Adv. Barde Dattatraya A.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Chhaya Dattatray Shelke Advocate - chavan Shailesh B.
-
2.Devidas Pandurang Sabale
Adv. chavan Shailesh B.
-
3.Bhaskar Bhika Padol
Adv. chavan Shailesh B.
Case History
-
06-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-Apr-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
-
10-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
-
28-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
-
06-Dec-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
-
15-Nov-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
-
29-Sep-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
-
18-Aug-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
-
24-Jun-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
-
21-Apr-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
-
07-Mar-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Joint CIVIL Judge, J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dindori
-
07-Feb-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Joint CIVIL Judge, J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dindori
-
31-Jan-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Joint CIVIL Judge, J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dindori
-
08-Jan-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Joint CIVIL Judge, J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dindori
-
27-Nov-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Joint CIVIL Judge, J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dindori
-
18-Oct-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Joint CIVIL Judge, J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dindori
-
23-Aug-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Joint CIVIL Judge, J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dindori
-
20-Jul-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Joint CIVIL Judge, J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dindori
-
05-Jul-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Joint CIVIL Judge, J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dindori
-
12-Jun-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Joint CIVIL Judge, J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dindori
-
19-Apr-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Joint CIVIL Judge, J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dindori
-
18-Mar-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Joint CIVIL Judge, J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dindori
-
06-Mar-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
2nd Joint CIVIL Judge, J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dindori
-
16-Feb-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The application filed by defendants 1-3 to set aside the "no written statement" order was allowed. The court permitted the defendants to file their written statement on record, subject to payment of Rs. 500 as cost to the plaintiff by the next date of hearing. The court took a liberal approach to allow merit-based adjudication despite noting the defendants' delay in filing was a dilatory tactic. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Feb-2024
W.S. and Say
2nd Joint CIVIL Judge, J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dindori
-
02-Feb-2024
W.S. and Say
2nd Joint CIVIL Judge, J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dindori
-
20-Jan-2024
W.S. and Say
2nd Joint CIVIL Judge, J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dindori
-
20-Dec-2023
W.S. and Say
2nd Joint CIVIL Judge, J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dindori
-
21-Oct-2023
W.S. and Say
2nd Joint CIVIL Judge, J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dindori
-
20-Sep-2023
W.S. and Say
2nd Joint CIVIL Judge, J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dindori
-
05-Aug-2023
Awaiting Notice
2nd Joint CIVIL Judge, J.D. And J.m.f.c., Dindori
-
23-Jun-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-Jun-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 119/2023
Summary: The application filed by defendants 1-3 to set aside the "no written statement" order was allowed. The court permitted the defendants to file their written statement on record, subject to payment of Rs. 500 as cost to the plaintiff by the next date of hearing. The court took a liberal approach to allow merit-based adjudication despite noting the defendants' delay in filing was a dilatory tactic. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts