State Through Dindori Police Station. vs Ramkishor Dhanaram Sen — 377/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS140007522024
e-Filing Number
30-04-2024
Filing Number
593/2024
Filing Date
13-Jun-2024
Registration No
377/2024
Registration Date
13-Jun-2024
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Dindori
Judge
2-CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
166
Police Station
DINDORI POLICE STATION
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Through Dindori Police Station.
Adv. App Valvi Rajendra B.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ramkishor Dhanaram Sen
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court stopped proceedings under Section 258 CrPC and discharged accused Ramkishor Dhanarao Sen from charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, citing prolonged pendency, prosecution's failure to secure his presence, and absence of the Competent Authority report. The accused's bail bond was canceled and confiscated liquor was ordered to be transferred to the State Excise Department after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
-
21-Jan-2026
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
-
12-Dec-2025
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
-
06-Oct-2025
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
-
08-May-2025
Awaiting Summons
-
12-Dec-2024
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
-
12-Sep-2024
Awaiting Summons
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
-
15-Jun-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Jun-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 377/2024
The court stopped proceedings under Section 258 CrPC and discharged accused Ramkishor Dhanarao Sen from charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, citing prolonged pendency, prosecution's failure to secure his presence, and absence of the Competent Authority report. The accused's bail bond was canceled and confiscated liquor was ordered to be transferred to the State Excise Department after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts