Arun Ganpat Khandve vs Maharashtra Government/ Police Inspector — 35/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 16th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHNS140004252026
e-Filing Number
27-02-2026
Filing Number
369/2026
Filing Date
04-Mar-2026
Registration No
35/2026
Registration Date
04-Mar-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court ,Dindori
Judge
2-CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Arun Ganpat Khandve
Adv. PRAMOD BHALERAO
Respondent(s)
-
1.Maharashtra Government/ Police Inspector
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The Dindori Police Court granted the petitioner Arun Ganapati Khandwe's application for interim custody of a seized Vivo V-27 mobile phone and Rs. 73,500 in currency notes. The court found that the petitioner established ownership through purchase bills and Aadhaar card, and no other claimant contested his right. The court imposed conditions including an indemnity bond of Rs. 1,10,000 and restrictions on disposal or modification of the phone pending trial conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
-
13-Mar-2026
Unready Board
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
-
11-Mar-2026
Unready Board
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
-
10-Mar-2026
Unready Board
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
-
06-Mar-2026
Unready Board
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC Dindori
-
04-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 35/2026
Summary: The Dindori Police Court granted the petitioner Arun Ganapati Khandwe's application for interim custody of a seized Vivo V-27 mobile phone and Rs. 73,500 in currency notes. The court found that the petitioner established ownership through purchase bills and Aadhaar card, and no other claimant contested his right. The court imposed conditions including an indemnity bond of Rs. 1,10,000 and restrictions on disposal or modification of the phone pending trial conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts