State through Pimpalgaon Police Station vs Namdev Ramesh Jadhav — 466/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 23rd March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHNS130010432024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

741/2024

Filing Date

24-07-2024

Registration No

466/2024

Registration Date

24-07-2024

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Pimpalgaon Baswant

Judge

3-2ND JOINT CIVIL JUDGE JD AND JMFC PIMPALGAON

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

173

Police Station

PIMPALGAON POLICE STATION

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

State through Pimpalgaon Police Station

Adv. APP Vyavhare Somnath A.

Respondent(s)

Namdev Ramesh Jadhav

Hearing History

Judge: 3-2ND JOINT CIVIL JUDGE JD AND JMFC PIMPALGAON

23-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

10-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

24-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

17-02-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary In this Marathi court judgment (Case No. 466/2024), the court acquitted the accused, Ramesh Jadav, of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E), for alleged illegal possession and sale of liquor. The court found that while 19 bottles of liquor were seized from the accused, the prosecution failed to conclusively prove through chemical analysis that the seized bottles actually contained alcohol, and insufficient evidence was presented to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court ordered the accused's release and directed the confiscated goods to be disposed of according to legal procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In this Marathi court judgment (Case No. 466/2024), the court acquitted the accused, Ramesh Jadav, of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E), for alleged illegal possession and sale of liquor. The court found that while 19 bottles of liquor were seized from the accused, the prosecution failed to conclusively prove through chemical analysis that the seized bottles actually contained alcohol, and insufficient evidence was presented to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court ordered the accused's release and directed the confiscated goods to be disposed of according to legal procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Pimpalgaon Baswant All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case