Dnyaneshwar Shivaji Bhandare Through Shivaji Narayan Bhandare vs Sunanda Sudam Jadhav Advocate - Chauhan Suresh H. — 60/2020
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 00. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHNS130007842020
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
96/2020
Filing Date
21-10-2020
Registration No
60/2020
Registration Date
21-10-2020
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Pimpalgaon Baswant
Judge
3-2ND JOINT CIVIL JUDGE JD AND JMFC PIMPALGAON
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dnyaneshwar Shivaji Bhandare Through Shivaji Narayan Bhandare
Adv. Shinde Sanjay M.
Respondent(s)
Sunanda Sudam Jadhav Advocate - Chauhan Suresh H.
Sandeep Sudam Jadhav
Nilesh Sudam Jadhav
Vaishali Sudam Wagh
Sunita Shivaji Wagh
Hearing History
Judge: 3-2ND JOINT CIVIL JUDGE JD AND JMFC PIMPALGAON
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 08-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 10-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 29-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready | |
| 07-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Summary: The defendant's application challenging the admissibility of a farming agreement dated 16/05/2019 was rejected. The court held that since the suit is for recovery of money (not for possession or specific performance) and the defendant did not deny the document's existence, the agreement can be exhibited and read as evidence. The court found that determining whether the document constitutes a lease is immaterial at this stage of the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The defendant's application challenging the admissibility of a farming agreement dated 16/05/2019 was rejected. The court held that since the suit is for recovery of money (not for possession or specific performance) and the defendant did not deny the document's existence, the agreement can be exhibited and read as evidence. The court found that determining whether the document constitutes a lease is immaterial at this stage of the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts