Dnyneshwari Vikram More vs Vikram Sadashiv More Advocate - Gaikwad Tribhuvan B. — 59/2019
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 00. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHNS130007352019
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
95/2019
Filing Date
03-07-2019
Registration No
59/2019
Registration Date
03-07-2019
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Pimpalgaon Baswant
Judge
1-JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Dnyneshwari Vikram More
Adv. Gavali Ravindra B.
Sujata Vikram More
Adv. Gavali Ravindra B.
Respondent(s)
Vikram Sadashiv More Advocate - Gaikwad Tribhuvan B.
Kusum Sadashiv More
Pratap Sadashiv More
Chaya Mahesh Gite
Kaveri vishnu Rajole
Manager, State Bank Of India
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 11-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 22-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 17-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction seeking to restrain defendants from alienating ancestral property in a partition suit. The judge held that under Hindu Law, a Karta (manager of Hindu Undivided Family) has indefeasible rights to manage family properties, which cannot be restrained by injunction despite other coparceners' interests. The application was dismissed with costs in cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction seeking to restrain defendants from alienating ancestral property in a partition suit. The judge held that under Hindu Law, a Karta (manager of Hindu Undivided Family) has indefeasible rights to manage family properties, which cannot be restrained by injunction despite other coparceners' interests. The application was dismissed with costs in cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts