Balkrushna Bhikaji Bhandare vs Raosaheb Bhausaheb Bhandare etc 1 Advocate - Tayade Vijay K. — 1300064/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section --. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHNS130005682015
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1300079/2015
Filing Date
16-05-2015
Registration No
1300064/2015
Registration Date
16-05-2015
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Pimpalgaon Baswant
Judge
3-2ND JOINT CIVIL JUDGE JD AND JMFC PIMPALGAON
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Balkrushna Bhikaji Bhandare
Adv. Deshmane Vijaykumar B.
Respondent(s)
Raosaheb Bhausaheb Bhandare etc 1 Advocate - Tayade Vijay K.
Balasaheb Bhausaheb Bhandare
Hearing History
Judge: 3-2ND JOINT CIVIL JUDGE JD AND JMFC PIMPALGAON
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 17-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 21-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard | |
| 17-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Summary: In the civil suit R.C.S. NO. 64/2015 (Balkrushna Bhandare v/s Raosaheb Bhandare), the court has framed additional issues (5-8) for determination following a previous order. The case involves a land dispute concerning whether a 65 R area belongs to the plaintiff's Gat no.210 land or constitutes encroachment on the defendant's Gat no.209 land, and whether defendants are entitled to compensatory costs of Rs.10,000 each. The matter remains pending for further adjudication on these framed issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In the civil suit R.C.S. NO. 64/2015 (Balkrushna Bhandare v/s Raosaheb Bhandare), the court has framed additional issues (5-8) for determination following a previous order. The case involves a land dispute concerning whether a 65 R area belongs to the plaintiff's Gat no.210 land or constitutes encroachment on the defendant's Gat no.209 land, and whether defendants are entitled to compensatory costs of Rs.10,000 each. The matter remains pending for further adjudication on these framed issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts