State of Maharashtra through Pimpalgaon (B), Police Station vs Lakhan Balu Pawar — 53/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(6),126(2),115(2),3(5),352. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS130004212025
Filing Number
331/2025
Filing Date
02-Apr-2025
Registration No
53/2025
Registration Date
02-Apr-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Pimpalgaon Baswant
Judge
1-Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
32
Police Station
PIMPALGAON POLICE STATION
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra through Pimpalgaon (B), Police Station
Adv. APP Vyavhare Somnath A.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Lakhan Balu Pawar
-
2.Tushar Popat Ambekar
-
3.Yash Ananda Gangurde
-
4.Shubham Pramod Bharade
Case History
-
20-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
28-Apr-2026
Hearing
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
17-Mar-2026
Hearing
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
23-Jan-2026
Hearing
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
05-Dec-2025
Hearing
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
10-Nov-2025
N.B.W._Ready
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
18-Sep-2025
Hearing
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
11-Aug-2025
Hearing
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
04-Aug-2025
Charge
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
02-Aug-2025
Appearance
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
30-Jul-2025
Steps
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
28-Jul-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: RCC No. 53/2025 Outcome: Bail granted. Accused no.4 Shubham Pramod Bharade was released on bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.30,000 and a solvent surety of equal amount, with conditions prohibiting commission of similar offences and tampering with evidence or witnesses. Key Facts: The accused was charged in connection with a dacoity where two persons on an unregistered motorcycle intercepted a complainant carrying Rs.3,50,000, assaulted him, and fled with the cash on 31.1.2025. Reasoning: The court granted bail considering the accused had been in custody since 1.2.2025 (over five months), had no criminal antecedents, was not a habitual offender, the charge-sheet was already filed with no near-term trial conclusion expected, and bail's purpose—securing the accused's presence at trial—would be adequately served through imposed conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Jul-2025
Steps
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
22-Jul-2025
Steps
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
18-Jul-2025
Steps
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
16-Jul-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
16-Jul-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
16-Jul-2025
Steps
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
15-Jul-2025
Steps
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
14-Jul-2025
Order
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
30-Jun-2025
Production of Accused
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
16-Jun-2025
Production of Accused
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
03-Jun-2025
Production of Accused
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
21-May-2025
Production of Accused
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
17-May-2025
Production of Accused
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
13-May-2025
Production of Accused
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
29-Apr-2025
Production of Accused
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
16-Apr-2025
Production of Accused
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
02-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 53/2025
Case Summary: RCC No. 53/2025 Outcome: Bail granted. Accused no.4 Shubham Pramod Bharade was released on bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.30,000 and a solvent surety of equal amount, with conditions prohibiting commission of similar offences and tampering with evidence or witnesses. Key Facts: The accused was charged in connection with a dacoity where two persons on an unregistered motorcycle intercepted a complainant carrying Rs.3,50,000, assaulted him, and fled with the cash on 31.1.2025. Reasoning: The court granted bail considering the accused had been in custody since 1.2.2025 (over five months), had no criminal antecedents, was not a habitual offender, the charge-sheet was already filed with no near-term trial conclusion expected, and bail's purpose—securing the accused's presence at trial—would be adequately served through imposed conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts