State through Ozar Police Station vs Rahul Puroshattam Zoman Advocate - Ghumare Tushar P. — 194/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 451, 354, 323, 504, 506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 06th April 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS130004012020
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
346/2020
Filing Date
24-07-2020
Registration No
194/2020
Registration Date
24-07-2020
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Pimpalgaon Baswant
Judge
2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC
Decision Date
06th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
03
Police Station
OZAR POLICE STATION
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State through Ozar Police Station
Adv. Tadvi Abid B. APP
Respondent(s)
Rahul Puroshattam Zoman Advocate - Ghumare Tushar P.
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC
Disposed
Arguments
Evidence
Evidence
B.W._Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 01-04-2026 | Arguments | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 18-12-2025 | B.W._Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted the accused, Rahul Purushottam Jhom, of all charges under IPC sections 451, 354, 323, 504, and 506. The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt because the two key prosecution witnesses (the complainant and her husband) retracted their statements in court and provided no credible evidence, making it impossible to establish the allegations of house trespass, criminal intimidation, and physical assault. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted the accused, Rahul Purushottam Jhom, of all charges under IPC sections 451, 354, 323, 504, and 506. The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt because the two key prosecution witnesses (the complainant and her husband) retracted their statements in court and provided no credible evidence, making it impossible to establish the allegations of house trespass, criminal intimidation, and physical assault. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts