Sandeep Shantaram Watpade vs Special Recovery Officer Maruti Rural Non Agricultural Coperative Credit Society Limited Advocate - Hadole Pravin B. — 57/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 9. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHNS130003072024
e-Filing Number
15-02-2024
Filing Number
76/2024
Filing Date
16-Feb-2024
Registration No
57/2024
Registration Date
16-Feb-2024
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Pimpalgaon Baswant
Judge
3-2Nd Joint CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Pimpalgaon
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sandeep Shantaram Watpade
Adv. Ranjeet Chavan
-
2.Sagar Shantaram Watpadade
Adv. Ranjeet Chavan
-
3.Sunanda Shantaram Watpade
Adv. Ranjeet Chavan
Respondent(s)
-
1.Special Recovery Officer Maruti Rural Non Agricultural Coperative Credit Society Limited Advocate - Hadole Pravin B.
-
2.Shantaram Yashwant Vatpade
Case History
-
23-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
21-Apr-2026
Evidence
2Nd Joint CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Pimpalgaon
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence
2Nd Joint CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Pimpalgaon
-
27-Jan-2026
Evidence
2Nd Joint CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Pimpalgaon
-
23-Dec-2025
Evidence
2Nd Joint CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Pimpalgaon
-
26-Nov-2025
Evidence
2Nd Joint CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Pimpalgaon
-
16-Oct-2025
Evidence
2Nd Joint CIVIL Judge Jd And JMFC Pimpalgaon
-
07-Aug-2025
Evidence
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
19-Jun-2025
Issues
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
28-Mar-2025
Issues
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
18-Feb-2025
Issues
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
04-Dec-2024
Issues
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
14-Oct-2024
Issues
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
01-Aug-2024
Issues
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
22-Jul-2024
Order on T.I.View PDF
Summary The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction to restrain the auction of ancestral agricultural property. The judge found that plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case, noting contradictions in their claims (plaintiff no.2 denied obtaining the Rs. 8,00,000 loan despite documentary evidence showing he had applied for it) and suspecting collusion between plaintiffs and defendant no.2. The court ruled that plaintiffs did not come with "clean hands" and were therefore ineligible for equitable relief; additionally, balance of convenience and irreparable loss did not favor them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Jul-2024
Issues
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
16-Jul-2024
Order on Exh
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
18-Jun-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
11-Jun-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
06-May-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
20-Apr-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
06-Apr-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
16-Mar-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
22-Feb-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Feb-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 57/2024
Summary The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction to restrain the auction of ancestral agricultural property. The judge found that plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case, noting contradictions in their claims (plaintiff no.2 denied obtaining the Rs. 8,00,000 loan despite documentary evidence showing he had applied for it) and suspecting collusion between plaintiffs and defendant no.2. The court ruled that plaintiffs did not come with "clean hands" and were therefore ineligible for equitable relief; additionally, balance of convenience and irreparable loss did not favor them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts