Pratibha Sandip Pagar vs Sandip Keshav Pagar — 51/2022
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 125. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHNS130002972022
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
236/2022
Filing Date
15-03-2022
Registration No
51/2022
Registration Date
15-03-2022
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Pimpalgaon Baswant
Judge
2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pratibha Sandip Pagar
Adv. Dayama Abhilasha S.
Aarya Sandip Pagar
Prasnna Sandip Pagar
Respondent(s)
Sandip Keshav Pagar
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 11-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 23-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 28-01-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The court rejected the maintenance petition (Section 125 CrPC) filed by petitioner 1 (the wife) against the respondent (husband), holding that she cannot be classified as a "wife" under law since her previous marriage was validly dissolved through divorce before she married the respondent. However, the court granted the petition for petitioners 2 and 3 (the two minor children), awarding them Rs. 7,000 per month maintenance from the date of filing, plus court costs of Rs. 5,000 to be paid by the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The court rejected the maintenance petition (Section 125 CrPC) filed by petitioner 1 (the wife) against the respondent (husband), holding that she cannot be classified as a "wife" under law since her previous marriage was validly dissolved through divorce before she married the respondent. However, the court granted the petition for petitioners 2 and 3 (the two minor children), awarding them Rs. 7,000 per month maintenance from the date of filing, plus court costs of Rs. 5,000 to be paid by the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts