Bank Of Maharashtra, Branch - Ranwad Through Santosh Ramesh Sonwane vs Vaman Sitaram Salave — 12/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 00. Disposed: Uncontested--DECIDED EX-PARTE on 09th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHNS130000552023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
12/2023
Filing Date
07-01-2023
Registration No
12/2023
Registration Date
07-01-2023
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Pimpalgaon Baswant
Judge
2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC
Decision Date
09th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECIDED EX-PARTE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bank Of Maharashtra, Branch - Ranwad Through Santosh Ramesh Sonwane
Adv. Thakare Swapnil R
Respondent(s)
Vaman Sitaram Salave
Shrikant Chandrakant Chavan
Dnyaneshwar Nivrutti Chavan
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND JMFC
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 17-02-2026 | Arguments | |
| 29-01-2026 | Arguments | |
| 02-01-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The court decreed that Bank of Maharashtra is entitled to recover Rs. 1,45,275.90 from all three defendants (jointly and severally) as outstanding loan amount, along with 6% annual interest from the date of filing until full recovery. The court found that Defendant 1 obtained a medium-term loan of Rs. 1,70,000 in 2015 for grape farming, which became a non-performing asset in May 2022, and Defendants 2 and 3 are jointly liable as guarantors for the loan repayment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The court decreed that Bank of Maharashtra is entitled to recover Rs. 1,45,275.90 from all three defendants (jointly and severally) as outstanding loan amount, along with 6% annual interest from the date of filing until full recovery. The court found that Defendant 1 obtained a medium-term loan of Rs. 1,70,000 in 2015 for grape farming, which became a non-performing asset in May 2022, and Defendants 2 and 3 are jointly liable as guarantors for the loan repayment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts