Bank Of Maharashtra, Branch - Ranwad Through Santosh Ramesh Sonwane vs Vaman Sitaram Salave — 12/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 00. Disposed: Uncontested--DECIDED EX-PARTE on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHNS130000552023

Filing Number

12/2023

Filing Date

07-Jan-2023

Registration No

12/2023

Registration Date

07-Jan-2023

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Pimpalgaon Baswant

Judge

2-CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECIDED EX-PARTE

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 00

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Bank Of Maharashtra, Branch - Ranwad Through Santosh Ramesh Sonwane

    Adv. Thakare Swapnil R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vaman Sitaram Salave

  2. 2.Shrikant Chandrakant Chavan

  3. 3.Dnyaneshwar Nivrutti Chavan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The court decreed that Bank of Maharashtra is entitled to recover Rs. 1,45,275.90 from all three defendants (jointly and severally) as outstanding loan amount, along with 6% annual interest from the date of filing until full recovery. The court found that Defendant 1 obtained a medium-term loan of Rs. 1,70,000 in 2015 for grape farming, which became a non-performing asset in May 2022, and Defendants 2 and 3 are jointly liable as guarantors for the loan repayment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  6. 29-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  7. 02-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  8. 19-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  9. 06-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  10. 14-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  11. 14-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  12. 16-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  13. 19-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  14. 16-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  15. 24-Jun-2025

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  16. 10-Jun-2025

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  17. 07-May-2025

    Arguments

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  18. 01-Apr-2025

    Arguments

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  19. 21-Feb-2025

    Arguments

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  20. 09-Jan-2025

    Arguments

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  21. 19-Nov-2024

    Arguments

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  22. 05-Nov-2024

    Arguments

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  23. 24-Sep-2024

    Arguments

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  24. 09-Aug-2024

    Arguments

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  25. 02-Jul-2024

    Arguments

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  26. 11-Jun-2024

    Arguments

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  27. 22-Mar-2024

    Arguments

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  28. 23-Feb-2024

    Arguments

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  29. 18-Jan-2024

    Arguments

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  30. 05-Dec-2023

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  31. 13-Oct-2023

    Ex-Parte Order

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  32. 15-Sep-2023

    Ex-Parte Order

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  33. 11-Jul-2023

    Reply/Say

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  34. 29-Apr-2023

    Reply/Say

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  35. 04-Mar-2023

    Notice_Unready

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC

  36. 07-Jan-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  37. 07-Jan-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 12/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The court decreed that Bank of Maharashtra is entitled to recover Rs. 1,45,275.90 from all three defendants (jointly and severally) as outstanding loan amount, along with 6% annual interest from the date of filing until full recovery. The court found that Defendant 1 obtained a medium-term loan of Rs. 1,70,000 in 2015 for grape farming, which became a non-performing asset in May 2022, and Defendants 2 and 3 are jointly liable as guarantors for the loan repayment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case