Vanajakshii Ravindran Tehkkarakath vs Nil — 4/2026
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section VIII. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 08th June 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHNS130000322026
e-Filing Number
09-01-2026
Filing Number
7/2026
Filing Date
13-Jan-2026
Registration No
4/2026
Registration Date
13-Jan-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Pimpalgaon Baswant
Judge
2-CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
Decision Date
08-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Vanajakshii Ravindran Tehkkarakath
Adv. Janardhan Rohidas Mogal
-
2.V Ravindran Manoranjan
Adv. Janardhan Rohidas Mogal
-
3.Madhuri Ravindran Valiakath
Adv. Janardhan Rohidas Mogal
-
4.Manjula Valiyaveetil Ravindran
Adv. Janardhan Rohidas Mogal
-
5.Mridula V R
Adv. Janardhan Rohidas Mogal
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nil
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-Jun-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court allowed the application and issued a Heirship Certificate under the Bombay Regulation Act, 1827, recognizing Vanajakshii Ravindran Tehkkarakath (widow) and applicants No.2-5 (children) as legal heirs of deceased V. Ravindran, who died on 04/12/2001. No objections were filed despite newspaper proclamation, and the court found no reason to disbelieve the applicants' claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Jun-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
22-Apr-2026
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
25-Feb-2026
Evidence
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
21-Jan-2026
Proclomation
CIVIL Judge J.D. And JMFC
-
13-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 4/2026
The court allowed the application and issued a Heirship Certificate under the Bombay Regulation Act, 1827, recognizing Vanajakshii Ravindran Tehkkarakath (widow) and applicants No.2-5 (children) as legal heirs of deceased V. Ravindran, who died on 04/12/2001. No objections were filed despite newspaper proclamation, and the court found no reason to disbelieve the applicants' claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts