Inspector, State Excise Department, Division Yeola vs Sunil Madhukar Sanap — 1191/2023
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS110052192023
Filing Number
1871/2023
Filing Date
01-Dec-2023
Registration No
1191/2023
Registration Date
02-Dec-2023
Court
Civil Court Senior Division ,Niphad
Judge
1-Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C.
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
181
Police Station
INSPECTOR, STATE EXCISE DEPARTMENT DIVISION YEOLA
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Inspector, State Excise Department, Division Yeola
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sunil Madhukar Sanap
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Nashik JMFC discharged accused Sunil Madhukar Sanap of charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, stopping proceedings under Section 281 BNSS. The court found that with the accused absconding for years, no C.A. report filed by prosecution, and no prospect of conviction, continuing the case served no purpose. Seized liquor and property were ordered sent to the Excise Department for disposal after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C.
-
08-Jan-2026
Awaiting Summons
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C.
-
07-Oct-2025
Awaiting Summons
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C.
-
06-Jul-2025
Awaiting Summons
Joint CIVIL Judge S.D. And Addl.C.J.M.
-
06-Nov-2024
Awaiting Summons
Joint CIVIL Judge S.D. And Addl.C.J.M.
-
23-Jul-2024
Awaiting Summons
Joint CIVIL Judge S.D. And Addl.C.J.M.
-
13-Dec-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Dec-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 1191/2023
The Nashik JMFC discharged accused Sunil Madhukar Sanap of charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, stopping proceedings under Section 281 BNSS. The court found that with the accused absconding for years, no C.A. report filed by prosecution, and no prospect of conviction, continuing the case served no purpose. Seized liquor and property were ordered sent to the Excise Department for disposal after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts