State thr. Niphad Police Station vs Sunil Dnyaneshwar Sonwane — 1086/2023
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS110047062023
Filing Number
1686/2023
Filing Date
18-Oct-2023
Registration No
1086/2023
Registration Date
21-Oct-2023
Court
Civil Court Senior Division ,Niphad
Judge
1-Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C.
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
344
Police Station
NIPHAD POLICE STATION
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State thr. Niphad Police Station
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sunil Dnyaneshwar Sonwane
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary The Nashik Judicial Magistrate discharged accused Sunil Dnyaneshwar Sonawane under Section 281 of BNSS in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case (Section 65(e) offense). The discharge was granted because the case, pending over 3 years, could not proceed due to the accused's prolonged absence and the prosecution's failure to file the required Constable's Report, making conviction impossible even if the accused appeared. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C.
-
14-Jan-2026
Awaiting Summons
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C.
-
24-Sep-2025
Awaiting Summons
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C.
-
15-Feb-2025
Unready Board
Joint CIVIL Judge S.D. And Addl.C.J.M.
-
14-Aug-2024
Unready Board
Joint CIVIL Judge S.D. And Addl.C.J.M.
-
26-Oct-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Oct-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 1086/2023
Summary The Nashik Judicial Magistrate discharged accused Sunil Dnyaneshwar Sonawane under Section 281 of BNSS in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case (Section 65(e) offense). The discharge was granted because the case, pending over 3 years, could not proceed due to the accused's prolonged absence and the prosecution's failure to file the required Constable's Report, making conviction impossible even if the accused appeared. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts