Inspector, State Excise Department, Flying Squad Dindori(Legal Heir) vs Ashabai Suresh Pimple — 1080/2023

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHNS110047022023

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

11-10-2023

Filing Number

1682/2023

Filing Date

21-10-2023

Registration No

1080/2023

Registration Date

21-10-2023

Court

Civil Court Senior Division ,Niphad

Judge

1-JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C.

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

209

Police Station

INSPECTOR, STATE EXCISE DEPARTMENT, FLYING SQUAD DINDORI

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65(E)

Petitioner(s)

Inspector, State Excise Department, Flying Squad Dindori(Legal Heir)

Adv. App

Respondent(s)

Ashabai Suresh Pimple

Hearing History

Judge: 1-JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C.

10-03-2026

Disposed

22-12-2025

Awaiting Summons

07-10-2025

Unready Board

11-08-2025

Unready Board

17-02-2025

Unready Board

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary The Nashik Judicial Magistrate discharged accused Ashabai Suresh Pimpale under Section 281 of BNSS in a liquor prohibition case, as the prosecution failed to file the Complaint Analysis (C.A.) report since the 2023 charge-sheet filing, making conviction impossible. The court found no purpose in continuing the 3-year-old proceeding given the accused's prolonged absence and lack of essential evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Nashik Judicial Magistrate discharged accused Ashabai Suresh Pimpale under Section 281 of BNSS in a liquor prohibition case, as the prosecution failed to file the Complaint Analysis (C.A.) report since the 2023 charge-sheet filing, making conviction impossible. The court found no purpose in continuing the 3-year-old proceeding given the accused's prolonged absence and lack of essential evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division ,Niphad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case