Balu Fakira Sonawane vs Shivaji Vithoba Sonawane — 330/2021
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 04th May 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHNS110041622021
Next Hearing
04th May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1281/2021
Filing Date
09-09-2021
Registration No
330/2021
Registration Date
14-09-2021
Court
Civil Court Senior Division ,Niphad
Judge
1-JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Balu Fakira Sonawane
Adv. Karad Sudhakar V
Respondent(s)
Shivaji Vithoba Sonawane
Sahebrao Vithoba Sonawane
Subhash Vithoba Sonawane
Executive Engineer Kadwa Canal Division Nashik
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C.
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 10-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 20-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 03-01-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready | |
| 28-11-2025 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Interim Orders
This is a Marathi language court order from the Nashik District Court dated 06/03/2024 concerning a property dispute (Civil Suit No. 330/2021). Summary: The petition filed under CPC Rule 26(9) is allowed. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to conduct a joint survey and demarcation of disputed agricultural land parcels (Gat No. 66 in Manjargaon and Gat No. 217 in Bhuse, Niphad taluka) between the plaintiff and three defendants, with instructions to clearly identify boundary encroachments and provide detailed report to the court for final adjudication of ownership rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a Marathi language court order from the Nashik District Court dated 06/03/2024 concerning a property dispute (Civil Suit No. 330/2021). Summary: The petition filed under CPC Rule 26(9) is allowed. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to conduct a joint survey and demarcation of disputed agricultural land parcels (Gat No. 66 in Manjargaon and Gat No. 217 in Bhuse, Niphad taluka) between the plaintiff and three defendants, with instructions to clearly identify boundary encroachments and provide detailed report to the court for final adjudication of ownership rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts