State thr. Laslagaon Police Station vs Sachin Shamrao Shinde — 666/2023
Case under Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Comm Section 6,6(A),24. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS110026512023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1016/2023
Filing Date
01-07-2023
Registration No
666/2023
Registration Date
01-07-2023
Court
Civil Court Senior Division ,Niphad
Judge
1-JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C.
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
FIR Details
FIR Number
56
Police Station
LASALGAON POLICE STATION
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State thr. Laslagaon Police Station
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Sachin Shamrao Shinde
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C.
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 19-01-2026 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 23-09-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 21-06-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The First Class Magistrate Court in Nifad convicted Sachin Shamrao Shinde (age 40) of selling tobacco products to minors in violation of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act, 2003 (Sections 6, 6(a), and 24). The accused pleaded guilty to the charges. The court imposed a lenient sentence considering it was his first offense and family circumstances: a fine of ₹300 with an alternative imprisonment of one day if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The First Class Magistrate Court in Nifad convicted Sachin Shamrao Shinde (age 40) of selling tobacco products to minors in violation of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act, 2003 (Sections 6, 6(a), and 24). The accused pleaded guilty to the charges. The court imposed a lenient sentence considering it was his first offense and family circumstances: a fine of ₹300 with an alternative imprisonment of one day if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts