Inspector, State Excise Department, Flying Squad Dindori vs Umesh Sopan Gaikwad — 645/2023
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E),68. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS110026012023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
984/2023
Filing Date
26-06-2023
Registration No
645/2023
Registration Date
26-06-2023
Court
Civil Court Senior Division ,Niphad
Judge
1-JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C.
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
61
Police Station
INSPECTOR, STATE EXCISE DEPARTMENT, FLYING SQUAD DINDORI
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector, State Excise Department, Flying Squad Dindori
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Umesh Sopan Gaikwad
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C.
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 14-01-2026 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 28-10-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 18-09-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 18-06-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Nashik Judicial Magistrate discharged accused Umesh Sopan Gaikwad of charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, stopping proceedings under Section 281 of B.N.S.S. The court found that since the case was over 3 years old, the accused remained absent, and the prosecution failed to file a Competent Authority (C.A.) report—making conviction impossible—further proceedings were futile and unjustified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Nashik Judicial Magistrate discharged accused Umesh Sopan Gaikwad of charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, stopping proceedings under Section 281 of B.N.S.S. The court found that since the case was over 3 years old, the accused remained absent, and the prosecution failed to file a Competent Authority (C.A.) report—making conviction impossible—further proceedings were futile and unjustified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts