State thr. Niphad Police Station vs Avinash Namdeo Raut — 605/2023
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS110023112023
Filing Number
905/2023
Filing Date
08-Jun-2023
Registration No
605/2023
Registration Date
08-Jun-2023
Court
Civil Court Senior Division ,Niphad
Judge
1-Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C.
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
167
Police Station
NIPHAD POLICE STATION
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State thr. Niphad Police Station
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
-
1.Avinash Namdeo Raut
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Nashik Judicial Magistrate discharged accused Avinash Namdev Raut of charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act by stopping proceedings under Section 281 of B.N.S.S. The court found that the case was over 3 years old with the accused continuously absent, and the prosecution failed to file the necessary C.A. report, making conviction impossible and further proceedings futile. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C.
-
20-Dec-2025
Awaiting Summons
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C.
-
03-Sep-2025
Awaiting Summons
3rd Jt. Cjsd and Addl. CJM Niphad
-
16-Mar-2025
Awaiting Summons
Joint CIVIL Judge S.D. And Addl.C.J.M.
-
16-Sep-2024
Awaiting Summons
Joint CIVIL Judge S.D. And Addl.C.J.M.
-
05-Dec-2023
Awaiting Summons
2nd Jt. C.J.S.D. and Addl. C.j.m., Niphad
-
17-Jun-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Jun-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 605/2023
The Nashik Judicial Magistrate discharged accused Avinash Namdev Raut of charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act by stopping proceedings under Section 281 of B.N.S.S. The court found that the case was over 3 years old with the accused continuously absent, and the prosecution failed to file the necessary C.A. report, making conviction impossible and further proceedings futile. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts