State thr. Laslagaon Police Station vs Tanvir Iliyas Shaikh — 389/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 188,269,270. Disposed: Uncontested--DECIDED on 10th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHNS110021792022

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

675/2022

Filing Date

07-06-2022

Registration No

389/2022

Registration Date

07-06-2022

Court

Civil Court Senior Division ,Niphad

Judge

1-JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C.

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECIDED

FIR Details

FIR Number

09

Police Station

LASALGAON POLICE STATION

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 188,269,270

Petitioner(s)

State thr. Laslagaon Police Station

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Tanvir Iliyas Shaikh

Nihal Gulab Tamboli

Sheru Munir Shaikh

Salim Musa Momin

Samir Shaukat Pathan

Anwar Aslam Pathan

Irfan Babulal Maniyar

Shakil Yusuf Pinjari

Afroj Akhatar Shaikh

Parwej Jamil Kadri

Ashraf Ismile Shaikh

Hearing History

Judge: 1-JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C.

10-03-2026

Disposed

10-12-2025

Awaiting Summons

13-09-2025

Awaiting Summons

09-09-2025

Awaiting Summons

09-06-2025

Awaiting Summons

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court discharged the accused and disposed of the case under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court found that while the accused were charged under IPC Sections 188, 269, and 270, Section 215(1) of BNSS requires a written complaint from the concerned public servant for cognizance of Section 188 offences, which was absent. Additionally, no evidence proved the ingredients of Sections 269 and 270 against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court discharged the accused and disposed of the case under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court found that while the accused were charged under IPC Sections 188, 269, and 270, Section 215(1) of BNSS requires a written complaint from the concerned public servant for cognizance of Section 188 offences, which was absent. Additionally, no evidence proved the ingredients of Sections 269 and 270 against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division ,Niphad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case