State thr. Laslagaon Police Station vs Ramesh Visvanath Gangurde — 525/2023
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65E. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS110019542023
Filing Number
781/2023
Filing Date
16-May-2023
Registration No
525/2023
Registration Date
16-May-2023
Court
Civil Court Senior Division ,Niphad
Judge
1-Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C.
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
274
Police Station
LASALGAON POLICE STATION
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State thr. Laslagaon Police Station
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ramesh Visvanath Gangurde
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court discharged accused Ramesh Vishwanath Gangurde of charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, stopping proceedings under Section 281 of B.N.S.S. The discharge was ordered because the case remained pending for over 3 years with the accused continuously absent, and the prosecution failed to file the required C.A. report, making conviction impossible regardless of the accused's presence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C.
-
12-Dec-2025
Awaiting Summons
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C.
-
18-Jul-2025
Awaiting Summons
Joint CIVIL Judge S.D. And Addl.C.J.M.
-
13-Nov-2024
Awaiting Summons
Joint CIVIL Judge S.D. And Addl.C.J.M.
-
15-Feb-2024
Awaiting Summons
2nd Jt. C.J.S.D. and Addl. C.j.m., Niphad
-
16-Sep-2023
Awaiting Summons
3rd Jt. Cjsd and Addl. CJM Niphad
-
20-Jul-2023
Awaiting Summons
3rd Jt. Cjsd and Addl. CJM Niphad
-
23-May-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-May-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 525/2023
The court discharged accused Ramesh Vishwanath Gangurde of charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, stopping proceedings under Section 281 of B.N.S.S. The discharge was ordered because the case remained pending for over 3 years with the accused continuously absent, and the prosecution failed to file the required C.A. report, making conviction impossible regardless of the accused's presence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts