State thr. Laslagaon Police Station vs Somnath Ganpat Shejwal — 679/2017

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHNS110019092017

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1148/2017

Filing Date

18-09-2017

Registration No

679/2017

Registration Date

18-09-2017

Court

Civil Court Senior Division ,Niphad

Judge

1-JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C.

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

38

Police Station

NIPHAD POLICE STATION

Year

2017

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65

Petitioner(s)

State thr. Laslagaon Police Station

Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

Somnath Ganpat Shejwal

Hearing History

Judge: 1-JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C.

10-03-2026

Disposed

22-12-2025

N.B.W._Unready

04-10-2025

N.B.W._Unready

09-03-2025

N.B.W._Unready

19-09-2024

N.B.W._Unready

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The Nashik Judicial Magistrate discharged accused Somnath Ganpat Shejwal of charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act by stopping proceedings under Section 281 of B.N.S.S. The court found that since the case was pending for over 9 years, the accused remained absent throughout, and the prosecution failed to file the required C.A. report despite the charge sheet being filed, further proceedings would serve no fruitful purpose and conviction was impossible without the C.A. report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Nashik Judicial Magistrate discharged accused Somnath Ganpat Shejwal of charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act by stopping proceedings under Section 281 of B.N.S.S. The court found that since the case was pending for over 9 years, the accused remained absent throughout, and the prosecution failed to file the required C.A. report despite the charge sheet being filed, further proceedings would serve no fruitful purpose and conviction was impossible without the C.A. report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division ,Niphad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case