Inspector, State Excise Department, Division Yeola vs Umesh Ashok Khule — 508/2023
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS110018902023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
752/2023
Filing Date
12-05-2023
Registration No
508/2023
Registration Date
12-05-2023
Court
Civil Court Senior Division ,Niphad
Judge
1-JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C.
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
61
Police Station
INSPECTOR, STATE EXCISE DEPARTMENT DIVISION YEOLA
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Inspector, State Excise Department, Division Yeola
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Umesh Ashok Khule
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C.
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 20-01-2026 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 23-09-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 15-04-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 08-10-2024 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Nashik Judicial Magistrate discharged accused Umesh Ashok Khule of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, citing that the case—pending for over 3 years—could not proceed without the required C.A. report, which the prosecution failed to file. The court invoked Section 281 of B.N.S.S. to stop proceedings, finding no fruitful purpose in continuing given the accused's prolonged absence and absence of critical evidence for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Nashik Judicial Magistrate discharged accused Umesh Ashok Khule of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, citing that the case—pending for over 3 years—could not proceed without the required C.A. report, which the prosecution failed to file. The court invoked Section 281 of B.N.S.S. to stop proceedings, finding no fruitful purpose in continuing given the accused's prolonged absence and absence of critical evidence for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts