Inspector, State Excise Department, Division Yeola vs Umesh Ashok Khule — 508/2023

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHNS110018902023

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

752/2023

Filing Date

12-05-2023

Registration No

508/2023

Registration Date

12-05-2023

Court

Civil Court Senior Division ,Niphad

Judge

1-JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C.

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

61

Police Station

INSPECTOR, STATE EXCISE DEPARTMENT DIVISION YEOLA

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65(E)

Petitioner(s)

Inspector, State Excise Department, Division Yeola

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Umesh Ashok Khule

Hearing History

Judge: 1-JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C.

10-03-2026

Disposed

20-01-2026

Awaiting Summons

23-09-2025

Awaiting Summons

15-04-2025

Awaiting Summons

08-10-2024

Awaiting Summons

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

The Nashik Judicial Magistrate discharged accused Umesh Ashok Khule of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, citing that the case—pending for over 3 years—could not proceed without the required C.A. report, which the prosecution failed to file. The court invoked Section 281 of B.N.S.S. to stop proceedings, finding no fruitful purpose in continuing given the accused's prolonged absence and absence of critical evidence for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Nashik Judicial Magistrate discharged accused Umesh Ashok Khule of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, citing that the case—pending for over 3 years—could not proceed without the required C.A. report, which the prosecution failed to file. The court invoked Section 281 of B.N.S.S. to stop proceedings, finding no fruitful purpose in continuing given the accused's prolonged absence and absence of critical evidence for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division ,Niphad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case