Inspector, State Excise Department, Division Yeola vs Umesh Ashok Khule — 508/2023
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS110018902023
Filing Number
752/2023
Filing Date
12-May-2023
Registration No
508/2023
Registration Date
12-May-2023
Court
Civil Court Senior Division ,Niphad
Judge
1-Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C.
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
61
Police Station
INSPECTOR, STATE EXCISE DEPARTMENT DIVISION YEOLA
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Inspector, State Excise Department, Division Yeola
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Umesh Ashok Khule
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Nashik Judicial Magistrate discharged accused Umesh Ashok Khule of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, citing that the case—pending for over 3 years—could not proceed without the required C.A. report, which the prosecution failed to file. The court invoked Section 281 of B.N.S.S. to stop proceedings, finding no fruitful purpose in continuing given the accused's prolonged absence and absence of critical evidence for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C.
-
20-Jan-2026
Awaiting Summons
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C.
-
23-Sep-2025
Awaiting Summons
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C.
-
15-Apr-2025
Awaiting Summons
Joint CIVIL Judge S.D. And Addl.C.J.M.
-
08-Oct-2024
Awaiting Summons
Joint CIVIL Judge S.D. And Addl.C.J.M.
-
27-Dec-2023
Awaiting Summons
2nd Jt. C.J.S.D. and Addl. C.j.m., Niphad
-
18-Jul-2023
Awaiting Summons
3rd Jt. Cjsd and Addl. CJM Niphad
-
16-May-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-May-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 508/2023
The Nashik Judicial Magistrate discharged accused Umesh Ashok Khule of charges under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, citing that the case—pending for over 3 years—could not proceed without the required C.A. report, which the prosecution failed to file. The court invoked Section 281 of B.N.S.S. to stop proceedings, finding no fruitful purpose in continuing given the accused's prolonged absence and absence of critical evidence for conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts