The State of Maharashtra vs Vikas Jayram Jagtapetc 2 Advocate - Thakare Ramesh J — 60056/2013
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 394,341,504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS110016262013
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
600056/2013
Filing Date
26-04-2013
Registration No
60056/2013
Registration Date
26-04-2013
Court
Civil Court Senior Division ,Niphad
Judge
1-JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C.
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
24
Police Station
NIPHAD POLICE STATION
Year
2013
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. A.P.P
Respondent(s)
Vikas Jayram Jagtapetc 2 Advocate - Thakare Ramesh J
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C.
Disposed
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 04-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 12-01-2026 | Evidence | |
| 03-12-2025 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted two accused (Vikash Jayram Jagtap and Chandrakant Baburao Khadtale) of charges under IPC Sections 394, 341, 504, 506 with Section 34, finding the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt due to weak and contradictory witness testimony. The third accused (Sunil Mhasu Avhad) died during proceedings, and the case against him was abated; his property was ordered to be produced in court as per CrPC Section 437-A. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted two accused (Vikash Jayram Jagtap and Chandrakant Baburao Khadtale) of charges under IPC Sections 394, 341, 504, 506 with Section 34, finding the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt due to weak and contradictory witness testimony. The third accused (Sunil Mhasu Avhad) died during proceedings, and the case against him was abated; his property was ordered to be produced in court as per CrPC Section 437-A. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts