State thr. Niphad Police Station vs Avinash Namdeorao Rauat — 249/2023
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e),83. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS110010072023
e-Filing Number
13-03-2023
Filing Number
382/2023
Filing Date
13-Mar-2023
Registration No
249/2023
Registration Date
13-Mar-2023
Court
Civil Court Senior Division ,Niphad
Judge
1-Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C.
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
335
Police Station
NIPHAD POLICE STATION
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State thr. Niphad Police Station
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Avinash Namdeorao Rauat
-
2.Nilesh Vasant Solse
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The court discharged accused Avinash Namdev Raut of charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, stopping proceedings under Section 281 of BNSS. The discharge was granted because the case was pending for over 3 years with the accused remaining absent, and the prosecution failed to file the required Chargeability Assessment (C.A.) report, making conviction impossible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C.
-
09-Dec-2025
Awaiting Summons
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C.
-
11-Sep-2025
Awaiting Summons
3rd Jt. Cjsd and Addl. CJM Niphad
-
20-Jun-2025
Awaiting Summons
Joint CIVIL Judge S.D. And Addl.C.J.M.
-
19-Oct-2024
Awaiting Summons
Joint CIVIL Judge S.D. And Addl.C.J.M.
-
13-Mar-2024
Awaiting Summons
2nd Jt. C.J.S.D. and Addl. C.j.m., Niphad
-
27-Jul-2023
Awaiting Summons
Joint CIVIL Judge S.D. And Addl.C.J.M.
-
16-Mar-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Mar-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 249/2023
Summary: The court discharged accused Avinash Namdev Raut of charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, stopping proceedings under Section 281 of BNSS. The discharge was granted because the case was pending for over 3 years with the accused remaining absent, and the prosecution failed to file the required Chargeability Assessment (C.A.) report, making conviction impossible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts