Inspector, State Excise Department, Division Yeola vs Sharad Balu Wagh — 226/2023
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS110008632023
Filing Number
337/2023
Filing Date
06-Mar-2023
Registration No
226/2023
Registration Date
06-Mar-2023
Court
Civil Court Senior Division ,Niphad
Judge
1-Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C.
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
3
Police Station
INSPECTOR, STATE EXCISE DEPARTMENT DIVISION YEOLA
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Inspector, State Excise Department, Division Yeola
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sharad Balu Wagh
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Nashik Judicial Magistrate discharged accused Sharad Balu Wagh of charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, stopping proceedings under Section 281 of B.N.S.S. The court found that since the case was over 3 years old, the accused remained absent, and the prosecution failed to file the C.A. report—making conviction impossible—no fruitful purpose would be served by continuing the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C.
-
09-Dec-2025
Awaiting Summons
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C.
-
11-Sep-2025
Awaiting Summons
3rd Jt. Cjsd and Addl. CJM Niphad
-
20-Jun-2025
Awaiting Summons
Joint CIVIL Judge S.D. And Addl.C.J.M.
-
05-Nov-2024
Awaiting Summons
Joint CIVIL Judge S.D. And Addl.C.J.M.
-
06-Feb-2024
Awaiting Summons
2nd Jt. C.J.S.D. and Addl. C.j.m., Niphad
-
26-Jul-2023
Awaiting Summons
Joint CIVIL Judge S.D. And Addl.C.J.M.
-
14-Mar-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 226/2023
The Nashik Judicial Magistrate discharged accused Sharad Balu Wagh of charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, stopping proceedings under Section 281 of B.N.S.S. The court found that since the case was over 3 years old, the accused remained absent, and the prosecution failed to file the C.A. report—making conviction impossible—no fruitful purpose would be served by continuing the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts