State thr. Saikheda Police Station vs Devidas @ Jiva Uttam Sangamnere Advocate - Jangam Balasaheb K — 104/2017
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 354(a)(b),324,352,323,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHNS110007332017
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
486/2017
Filing Date
03-05-2017
Registration No
104/2017
Registration Date
03-05-2017
Court
Civil Court Senior Division ,Niphad
Judge
1-JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C.
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
16
Police Station
SAIKHEDA POLICE STATION
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State thr. Saikheda Police Station
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
Devidas @ Jiva Uttam Sangamnere Advocate - Jangam Balasaheb K
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JOINT CIVIL JUDGE J.D. AND J.M.F.C.
Disposed
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. | |
| 04-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 18-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 23-01-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted the accused Devidass Urfi (32 years) of charges under IPC sections 354, 354(b), 324, 504, and 506 on March 10, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as the victim's testimony was incomplete and contradictory, and the prosecution's key witnesses could not adequately support the allegations of criminal intimidation, assault, and abusive behavior. The court determined that the evidence presented was insufficient to prove the accused's guilt conclusively. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted the accused Devidass Urfi (32 years) of charges under IPC sections 354, 354(b), 324, 504, and 506 on March 10, 2026. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the charges beyond reasonable doubt, as the victim's testimony was incomplete and contradictory, and the prosecution's key witnesses could not adequately support the allegations of criminal intimidation, assault, and abusive behavior. The court determined that the evidence presented was insufficient to prove the accused's guilt conclusively. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts