Ashok Laxman Pawar vs State of Maharashtra through P I Lasalgaon Police Station — 32/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHNS110005812026

e-Filing Number

20-02-2026

Filing Number

280/2026

Filing Date

21-Feb-2026

Registration No

32/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Court Senior Division ,Niphad

Judge

1-Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C.

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECREED

Last updated 29-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

30

Police Station

LASALGAON POLICE STATION

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ashok Laxman Pawar

    Adv. Avinash Ugalmugale

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra through P I Lasalgaon Police Station

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court granted Ashok Laxman Pawar's application under BNNS Section 503 for release of his seized Hero motorcycle (MH-15GK-2559), finding that prolonged police custody would cause deterioration and relying on Supreme Court precedent that seized property should not be kept idle. The court released the vehicle on an indemnity bond of Rs. 35,000 with conditions prohibiting structural changes, sale, transfer, or illegal use until case conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C.

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C.

  5. 04-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C.

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 21-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 32/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted Ashok Laxman Pawar's application under BNNS Section 503 for release of his seized Hero motorcycle (MH-15GK-2559), finding that prolonged police custody would cause deterioration and relying on Supreme Court precedent that seized property should not be kept idle. The court released the vehicle on an indemnity bond of Rs. 35,000 with conditions prohibiting structural changes, sale, transfer, or illegal use until case conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case