Rohidas Nivrutti Ghayal vs State thr. Laslagaon Police Station — 31/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 17th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHNS110005802026
e-Filing Number
20-02-2026
Filing Number
279/2026
Filing Date
21-Feb-2026
Registration No
31/2026
Registration Date
21-Feb-2026
Court
Civil Court Senior Division ,Niphad
Judge
1-Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C.
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREED
Last updated 29-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rohidas Nivrutti Ghayal
Adv. SHINDE ISHWAR RAMKRUSHNA
Respondent(s)
-
1.State thr. Laslagaon Police Station
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary The court granted the applicant Rohidas Nivrutti Ghayal's petition for release of his seized motorcycle (MH 15 GY0717) under Section 503 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, recognizing him as the registered owner and finding that prolonged police custody would cause deterioration. The court ordered release on an indemnity bond of Rs. 35,000 with conditions that the applicant cannot alter the vehicle's structure, must produce it as required, cannot transfer or sell it, and cannot use it illegally until the case conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C.
-
10-Mar-2026
Arguments
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C.
-
04-Mar-2026
Arguments
Joint CIVIL Judge J.D. And J.M.F.C.
-
23-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 31/2026
Summary The court granted the applicant Rohidas Nivrutti Ghayal's petition for release of his seized motorcycle (MH 15 GY0717) under Section 503 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, recognizing him as the registered owner and finding that prolonged police custody would cause deterioration. The court ordered release on an indemnity bond of Rs. 35,000 with conditions that the applicant cannot alter the vehicle's structure, must produce it as required, cannot transfer or sell it, and cannot use it illegally until the case conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts