State thr. Chandwad Police Station vs Vikky Alais Vikram Prakash Alais Sitaram Ahire UTP Advocate - Gunjal Vinod D — 70/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 376,2 I 506. Status: Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.. Next hearing: 04th May 2026.

Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)

CNR: MHNS100014232022

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

Next Hearing

04th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

750/2022

Filing Date

15-10-2022

Registration No

70/2022

Registration Date

15-10-2022

Court

District Court-1 ,Niphad

Judge

3-DISTRICT JUDGE - 1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE

FIR Details

FIR Number

300

Police Station

CHANDWAD POLICE STATION

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 376,2 I 506
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act, 2012 Section 3,6,a 4 5 I II L

Petitioner(s)

State thr. Chandwad Police Station

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Vikky Alais Vikram Prakash Alais Sitaram Ahire UTP Advocate - Gunjal Vinod D

Hearing History

Judge: 3-DISTRICT JUDGE - 1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE

21-04-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

07-04-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

01-04-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

10-03-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

02-03-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

Interim Orders

08-12-2025
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The court rejected the request from the Forensic Science Laboratory to record witness Maruti Somnath Ghuge's evidence via video conferencing. The court ordered the witness to appear personally in court on the next date, considering the serious nature of the case (involving DNA analysis), the need to show multiple documents to the witness, and connectivity issues that would impede remote testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court rejected the request from the Forensic Science Laboratory to record witness Maruti Somnath Ghuge's evidence via video conferencing. The court ordered the witness to appear personally in court on the next date, considering the serious nature of the case (involving DNA analysis), the need to show multiple documents to the witness, and connectivity issues that would impede remote testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Court-1 ,Niphad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case