State thr. Chandwad Police Station vs Anil Ashok Khainar - 5 UTP No 1 to 3 Advocate - Gunjal Chinmay K. — 97/2024

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),118(1),115,189(2),191(2),191(3),190,352,351(2). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.

Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)

CNR: MHNS100014192024

Evidence

Next Hearing

29th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

739/2024

Filing Date

30-11-2024

Registration No

97/2024

Registration Date

02-12-2024

Court

District Court-1 ,Niphad

Judge

3-DISTRICT JUDGE - 1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE

FIR Details

FIR Number

333

Police Station

CHANDWAD POLICE STATION

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 103(1),118(1),115,189(2),191(2),191(3),190,352,351(2)
Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Section 3(1),3(r),3(s),3(2)(v)

Petitioner(s)

State thr. Chandwad Police Station

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Anil Ashok Khainar - 5 UTP No 1 to 3 Advocate - Gunjal Chinmay K.

Bhagavan Ashok Khainar UTP

Ashok Sadashiv Khainar UTP

Swati Anil Khainar

Sonali Bhagavan Khainar

Hearing History

Judge: 3-DISTRICT JUDGE - 1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE

07-04-2026

Evidence

24-03-2026

Evidence

10-03-2026

Evidence

25-02-2026

Evidence

12-02-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

19-09-2025
Order on Exhibit

Outcome Summary: The bail application of accused Nos. 1 (Anil Ashok Khairnar) and 3 (Ashok Sadashiv Khairnar) has been rejected. The court found prima facie evidence of their involvement in the fatal assault of the victim, with accused No. 1 inflicting stab injuries and accused No. 3 restraining the deceased, making them ineligible for bail based on the serious nature of the charges under IPC and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocity) Act, 1989. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Outcome Summary: The bail application of accused Nos. 1 (Anil Ashok Khairnar) and 3 (Ashok Sadashiv Khairnar) has been rejected. The court found prima facie evidence of their involvement in the fatal assault of the victim, with accused No. 1 inflicting stab injuries and accused No. 3 restraining the deceased, making them ineligible for bail based on the serious nature of the charges under IPC and SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocity) Act, 1989. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Court-1 ,Niphad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case